The Character of Falstaff in Henry IV :: Henry IV Henry V Essays

The Character of Falstaff in Henry IV The character Sir John Falstaff played a crucial part in Shakespeares Henry IV, Part 1. Falstaff portrayed a side of life story that was both brutal and harsh. This was important because ,as Falstaff was, all the other important(prenominal) characters in the play were Nobles. Unlike Falstaff, the other nobles in the play acted as nobles. Falstaff, on the other hand acted more like the lower class people. In doing this he portrayed the thoughts and feelings of the lower class people. As he portrayed the lower class people, Falstaff brought the reader to think. This was because Falstaff contrasted well with the nobles and brought erupt new aspects of the themes. Some of these views brought out be Falstaff were quite harsh, in comparison to the accepted views of the time. To help balance the harshness of his views, Falstaff was very good natured and invoked laughter in the reader. Falstaff lived a harsh life and the severity of h is life contributed to his views and ideas. Although he was a noble, his views reflected those of the lower class people. Falstaff did not hold the same view of honor as any of the other main characters in the novel. To Falstaff, honor was just a word and nothing worth dying over. Some characters in the novel sought honor through battle. Falstaff, on the plus side, felt that war was just a place where people had fun. He showed this when he allowed himself to be paid off by the upperclassmen and took the prisoners and thieves to be killed in battle. Falstaff knew that they would just be killed and that it was not worth it to have men with a future be killed. He, rather, led the men with no life into battle, to be killed. Falstaff alike had a different view of loyalty than any of the other nobles. The nobles felt that one should be loyal to all. Falstaff felt that one should be loyal unless to other thieves. Falstaff was an excellent talker and also well versed.

Aristotle vs Plato Essay -- Metaphysics,The Four Causes, Soul and Body

Aristotle is considered by many to be one of the most influential philosophers in history. As a student of Plato, he built on his mentors metaphysical teachings of things like The Theory of Forms and his views on the soul. However, he as well challenged them, introducing his own metaphysical ideas such as roleplay and potency, hylemorphism, and the four causes. He used these ideas to explain his account of the soul and the immateriality of intellect. Prior to Aristotle, philosophers like Parmenides and Heraclitus argued close to the existence of change. Aristotle used the terms act and potency to respond to Parmenides arguments about changes non-existence and bridge the gap between Parmenides and Heraclitus polar views. Aristotle used act and potency to examine numerous things such as, motion, causality and metaphysics. He explained that the act or actuality of a thing is its truest way of existence and that potency or authorisation is a things capability of bei ng, further than its current existence. For example, a soccer ball is in actuality on the field but in potentiality it can be kicked and enter the goal. According to Aristotles reasoning, the becoming or change of the soccer ball occurs when a potential is actualized. Though these changes occur, the thing itself stays the same. When the ball is kicked, it loses the actuality of being on the field and gains the actuality of being in the goal in turn, the ball then loses the potentiality of being in the goal and gains the potentiality of being on the field. Aristotle later explains that the full reality of a thing is when the actuality and potentiality of a thing are combined. He notes that while things can be pure potency, significance not actual or real, that there is... ...usible argument. I can see the understanding in both schools of thought. If I were to think logically I would pronounce Aristotle, because he based his conclusions on science and evidence. However, it is their views on the soul where I make my decision on who I (If I had to choose) agree with. I in person believe that the soul, my soul, is something that exists separate from my body. I believe that my body is a temporary and imperfect thing, but that my soul is immortal. I cannot say that I have love to this conclusion because it is the more plausible answer, but rather a belief in my faith that this life is temporary and all souls are eternal. While I understand that this view isnt completely in line with Platos, I think Platos is closer than Aristotles to mine.Aristotle. De Anima. Basic Works of Aristotle. Ed. Richard McKeon. New York random House, 1941.

99 Cent Store Case Study Essay -- essays research papers

99 Cent Only Business Strategy v. The contestDavid Gold, founder and CEO says the 99 Cent strategy is to create the shortest path possible between the customer and the sale (Rae-Dupree, 2004). This is important in deep send packing retail in order to purchase close-out and other special-situation merchandise at prices substantially below wholesale that sell at prices significantly below symmetric retail (Symplicity, 2005). Over the past two years, the company has suffered a $17.00/share loss on its stock (from $30 to $13.00) mainly due to declining operating margins (Domash, 2004) caused by over-optimism in the Texas market. Competitors were more deeply entrenched than their research had shown, and reduced earnings forecasts combined with declining operating margins were the sell signal for many investors in the company. Also, the need to gain their IT infrastructure to support expansion in its California base market was the second company downfall. The following is a summary of the company strategy1. management on brand name consumables.2.Broad selection of regularly available merchandise.3.Attractive and well-maintained stores.4.Strong supplier relationships.5.Focus on larger stores and wider demographic of value-conscious customers.6.welcome and Flexible ...